From a liability perspective, contaminated soil at a construction project is the responsibility of the property owner. As a practical matter, however, contractors must be aware of several issues when working on a construction project where contamination exists.
Although the relevant regulatory agency may not require the contractor to clean up a property with pre-existing soil or groundwater contamination, contractors must consider several related issues when a project will require ground disturbance:
Review your contract: Most contracts contain specific notice, change order, or indemnification provisions related to contamination or hazardous materials. If the contractor does not comply with these provisions, the owner’s problem can become the contractor’s problem.
Track delays and expenses: Identification and classification of contaminated soil will delay the project – without careful record-keeping and compliance with the contract notice provisions, the owner may successfully shift responsibility for these delays and expenses to the contractor.
Ensure safety: Take necessary precautions for worker safety (e.g. preparing and implementing a soil management plan).
Consider stockpiling and disposal: Stockpiling may not be permissible - or plastic sheeting and a berm may be required. Disposal of contaminated soil at permitted landfills using a licensed transporter will include additional expense.
Adjacent Properties: Even if your project site does not have contamination, if it is located adjacent to a contaminated site, you will need to consider whether flooding or groundwater flow can transfer soil contamination to your project site. In many instances, a site boundary such as a wall or fence is not sufficient to act as a barrier to prevent the migration of contaminants to adjacent properties.
Vapor Mitigation: In addition to excavation concerns, any site that has contaminated soil and/or groundwater may require installation of a vapor mitigation system in a new structure. Contractors must take careful note if the specifications require a chemical vapor mitigation system. This is not the same as a simple moisture barrier. If the contractor does not properly install, inspect and test the vapor mitigation system, litigation and liability may ensue.
If you are working on a project site that has pre-existing contamination, consider these steps and precautions. Have other thoughts or questions about environmental issues? Contact a member of Hirschler’s Environmental Practice or Construction Law Group.
As president of Hirschler and head of the firm's litigation section, Courtney knows how to lead people and projects to a successful outcome.
Leveraging deep experience in the construction industry, Courtney advises public and ...
Kelly’s practice focuses on construction law, commercial and product liability law, with an emphasis on dispute resolution—including mediation, arbitration, jury and bench trials in state and federal court. She routinely ...
Lisa Goodwin loves using her analytical skills to provide practical solutions when environmental issues arise. She recognizes that a clear understanding of her clients' short- and long-term goals is essential for ensuring they ...
Nate fully engages in each case and shoulders his clients’ needs. Communication, efficiency and careful judgment define his practice. In every case, he investigates competing claims to thoroughly understand their strengths ...
A professional engineer (P.E.) and an experienced lawyer, Webb began practicing at Hirschler Fleischer following four years of work as a consulting engineer. His multidisciplinary practice focuses on general business and ...
SubscribeSubscribe to Hirschler by Email
- New Defense to Joint Liability Available to Contractors
- What Employers Need to Know About Virginia’s New Overtime Wage Act
- OSHA Increases Amounts of Civil Penalties for 2021
- Have Force Majeure Defenses Based on COVID-19 Been Successful This Year?
- Kelly Bundy and Liz Burneson Publish Article on Joint Employer Status in Construction Executive
- Kelly Bundy Authors Article for ABA Construction Law Forum’s “Under Construction” Series
- Miller Act Notice More Than 90 Days Before A Subcontractor’s Final Day of Work Held Untimely
- Virginia Supreme Court Allows Sub-Sub Material Supplier To Recover Directly From General Contractor For Unpaid Material
- New Virginia Law Can Make General Contractors Liable for Subcontractors' Employee Wages
- OSHA Changes Course on COVID-19 Record-Keeping Requirements
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Lien Waivers
- Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)
- COVID-19, Coronavirus Outbreak
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Little Miller Act
- Dispute Resolution
- Miller Act
- Government Contracts
- Workforce Development
- Mechanic's Liens
- Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation (DPOR)
- Force Majeure
- Joint Checks
- Unjust Enrichment
- Virginia Employment Commission (VEC)
- Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission
- Uniform Statewide Building Code
- Change Orders
- April 2021
- January 2021
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016