On February 22, 2024, a federal judge in Texas issued a ruling delaying the implementation of the National Labor Relations Board’s new rule on joint employers. The rule—which will now be effective March 11, 2024—expands the current standard for determining joint-employer status. This expansion means that more employers will likely be subject to responsibilities and liabilities associated with workers who were not previously considered their employees.
The rule, which was originally supposed to take effect on December 26, 2023, instructs that a company is a joint employer of another company’s employees if the two companies share or codetermine the employees’ “essential terms and conditions of employment.” The rule provides a list of the essential terms and conditions, which include pay, hours of work, scheduling, work assignments, and supervision. Direct or indirect responsibility for any one of these essential terms and conditions can result in joint-employer status.
The expanded rule is expected to result in more joint-employer findings, particularly in industries that rely on contract services. For example, general contractors who rely on staffing agencies, or who have subcontractors on their project sites, may very well be considered joint employers of workers on the job that they do not directly employ. It is not unusual for a GC to coordinate the work of multiple trades a job site, but this relationship leaves the GC legally exposed to claims from its subcontractors’ employees.
Notably, the NLRB’s rule defines joint employment under the NLRA, but other agencies (DOL, EEOC) may apply different standards to determine joint employer status. In other words, the test varies by agency.
While the status of the rule remains in flux, general contractors should review their contracts to minimize joint employer exposure. Language that clearly defines the role of the GC and that limits its responsibility for another entity’s employees will be key. However, even if the contract is clear that the parties have no intention of being joint employers, GCs must ensure that the control that they actually exercise in practice aligns with the delineation of responsibilities set forth in the contract. On the job site, GCs should provide general direction to their subcontractors, but avoid dictating the “essential terms and conditions of employment” for a subcontractor’s workers.
If you have questions about the final rule or how it may impact your business, please contact a member of the Hirschler employment law group.
Andy leads Hirschler's employment law practice group and devotes his practice to helping clients navigate complex employment and business issues. Companies and their executives rely upon his practical advice and sound judgment ...
Jaime handles a variety of civil litigation matters, with a particular emphasis on cases arising out of real property disputes, including appeals of zoning and other land use decisions, appeals of tax assessments, and construction ...
Matt advises clients on a wide range of employment issues including leave, discrimination prevention, and wage and hour regulations. His practice encompasses the full spectrum of services from counseling to litigation. He has ...
Subscribe
Subscribe to Hirschler by EmailRecent Posts
- “No Damages for Delay” Provisions Held Unenforceable
- NLRB ‘Joint Employer’ Rule Delayed Once Again
- AIA Construction Forecast Foresees Cooling Construction Spending
- Virginia Mechanic’s Liens – “Merely Inaccurate” or “Invalid and Unenforceable”?
- Tools to Protect Construction Businesses from the Effects of a Third Party Bankruptcy
- The Death of “Pay-When-Paid” in Virginia: Truth or Rumor?
- A New Trap for Unwary Contractors: Holding Payment on One Project for Claims in Another
- What Employers Need To Know About the OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard on COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing
- Kelly Bundy Appointed to the Virginia Safety and Health Codes Board
- Jaime Wisegarver Outlines Labor Department Guidance on Travel Time Pay in Construction Executive
Popular Topics
- Contracts
- Employment
- Mechanic's Liens
- Legislation
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Damages
- Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)
- Delays
- Insurance
- Litigation
- COVID-19, Coronavirus Outbreak
- Dispute Resolution
- Safety
- Government Contracts
- Indemnification
- Suretyship
- Records
- Little Miller Act
- Payment
- Procurement
- Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation (DPOR)
- Workforce Development
- Miller Act
- Environmental
- FLSA
- Subrogation
- Licenses
- Negligence
- Tax
- Arbitration
- Mediation
- Scheduling
- Virginia Employment Commission (VEC)
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Lien Waivers
- Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission
- Force Majeure
- Joint Checks
- Unjust Enrichment
- Uniform Statewide Building Code
- Change Orders
Contributors
Archives
- March 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- May 2023
- May 2022
- March 2022
- November 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- January 2021
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016