NOTE: We updated this blog post to include the introduction of SB426 by Senate Majority Leader Dick Saslaw. Senator Saslaw previously indicated that he would not seek to repeal right-to-work laws. SB426 reflects a change in the Senator’s position on this topic, and an increased likelihood that some form of Right to Work repeal may pass in the legislature this year.
As Democrats have now taken control of Virginia’s legislature, legislators and pundits have begun to debate repealing Virginia’s Right to Work law. Delegate Lee Carter of Manassas has filed a bill that would repeal Right to Work in its entirety, House Bill 153. Senator Dick Saslaw of Fairfax has filed a bill that would represent a partial repeal of Right to Work, Senate Bill 426. What is Right to Work and what could a repeal of the law mean for you?
What is (and isn’t) Right to Work?
First, it is important to note what Right to Work is not. Right to Work laws are often confused with the doctrine of At-Will Employment. In Virginia, At-Will Employment is the rule that employees can be dismissed at any time, for any reason that is not illegal. The At-Will Employment doctrine is not going anywhere.
Right to Work, on the other hand, is a more limited principle. Right to Work means that an employer is not allowed to require employees to pay union dues or an “agency fee” as a condition of employment. Unions collect “dues” from employees to support all of the union’s activities. Alternatively, Unions collect an “agency fee” (also called a “fair share fee” by Union advocates) from employees that do not wish to be members of the union. The union applies the agency fee to the union’s collective bargaining efforts, but not towards the union’s organizing or political efforts. In states with right-to-work laws like Virginia, employees can refuse to join the union and refuse to pay the agency fee.
House Bill 153 would fully repeal right to work, allowing employers to require union membership (and union dues) as a condition of employment. Senate Bill 426, on the other hand, would allow employers to make payment of an agency fee compulsory, but not union membership.
Union advocates argue that collecting an agency fee prevents non-union employees from obtaining the collective bargaining benefits of union membership without paying for them. In contrast, proponents of Right to Work believe that the law gives employees greater freedom to choose their level of engagement with the union. On a larger scale, proponents of Right to Work argue that a repeal would hurt economic development and provide a disincentive for businesses to relocate or expand operations in Virginia.
Virginia was one of the first states to pass a Right to Work law in 1947, the same year that federal legislation allowed states to pass such laws. Now, more than half of the states in the country currently have Right to Work laws in place.
What would a repeal mean?
The future of Right to Work is uncertain, but passage of HB153 and SB426 is far from a sure bet. And any bill that passes the legislature would need to be signed by Governor Ralph Northam, who has expressed skepticism about repealing Right to Work.
With this uncertainty, it is important to consider how an eventual repeal could affect your workplace. If the Right to Work laws were to be repealed, the effects likely would not be felt for some time – especially for employers whose workplaces are not currently unionized. In the long term, a repeal could strengthen the unions; if unions can collect agency fees from all employees, they will be better funded, and may recruit more employees to join, strengthening the union’s bargaining position. Stronger unions could mean increased business costs associated with an uptick in union activity and bargaining power, and potential issues with employee recruitment.
Hirschler will keep a close watch on HB153, SB426,and other attempts to repeal Right to Work laws in Virginia. If you have questions about Right to Work, please contact your Hirschler attorney.
As president of Hirschler and head of the firm's litigation section, Courtney knows how to lead people and projects to a successful outcome.
Leveraging deep experience in the construction industry, Courtney advises public and ...
Liz combines enthusiasm and diligence to help her clients resolve complex disputes. Whether the dispute is a construction claim, a breach of contract, or a business tort, Liz brings focus and determination to every case. Liz has ...
Kelly’s practice focuses on construction law, commercial and product liability law, with an emphasis on dispute resolution—including mediation, arbitration, jury and bench trials in state and federal court. She routinely ...
Nate fully engages in each case and shoulders his clients’ needs. Communication, efficiency and careful judgment define his practice. In every case, he investigates competing claims to thoroughly understand their strengths ...
A professional engineer (P.E.) and an experienced lawyer, Webb began practicing at Hirschler Fleischer following four years of work as a consulting engineer. His multidisciplinary practice focuses on general business and ...
SubscribeSubscribe to Hirschler by Email
- Kelly Bundy and Liz Burneson Publish Article on Joint Employer Status in Construction Executive
- Kelly Bundy Authors Article for ABA Construction Law Forum’s “Under Construction” Series
- Miller Act Notice More Than 90 Days Before A Subcontractor’s Final Day of Work Held Untimely
- Virginia Supreme Court Allows Sub-Sub Material Supplier To Recover Directly From General Contractor For Unpaid Material
- New Virginia Law Can Make General Contractors Liable for Subcontractors' Employee Wages
- OSHA Changes Course on COVID-19 Record-Keeping Requirements
- New OSHA Guidance Suspends Enforcement of Record-Keeping Requirements for COVID-19 Cases in Most Industries
- What the Virginia Temporary Stay at Home Order Means for Your Business
- Ten Tips For Addressing Coronavirus Concerns In Your Workplace
- Closure of “Non-Essential Businesses” and “Stay at Home” Orders: What Do These Mean for the Construction Industry?
- COVID-19, Coronavirus Outbreak
- Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)
- Little Miller Act
- Miller Act
- Dispute Resolution
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Government Contracts
- Workforce Development
- Mechanic's Liens
- Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation (DPOR)
- Joint Checks
- Unjust Enrichment
- Virginia Employment Commission (VEC)
- Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission
- Uniform Statewide Building Code
- Change Orders
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016